The most trying ordeal

Jonathan Square

African American boy, possibly a slave, holding two buckets, Isaac Haas, photographer & dealer in stereoscopic views, Green Cove Springs, Fla. Courtesy, Library of Congress, prints and Photographs Division, [lc-dig-ppmsca-53047].

A surviving carte de visite of a young black boy, archived at the Library of Congress, shows him in ragged clothing - not atypical for enslaved persons. We unfortunately do not know his name or history, but we can see that his threadbare attire was probably constructed from linen. We know, too, that clothing like his could be dreadfully uncomfortable, a little-recognized part of a dehumanizing and brutal reality. Cheap, coarse garments like these played a critical role in the experience of enslavement.

While cotton is the textile most associated with slavery, linen also played an important role in the day-to-day lives of enslaved people. Tracing this history is difficult due to indiscriminate terminology at the time. “Negro cloth” was used to describe any cheap textile intended for enslaved people’s clothing, whether cotton, wool, linen, or some combination of these. But researchers like Eulanda Sanders have also gathered more specific evidence that African Americans wore a variety of low-quality textiles like osnaburg, a plain-weave textile sold unbleached or in white, blue, or neutral colors and named for the German city of Osnabrück where it was originally produced.

Most enslaved people received either allotments of “negro cloth,” from which they were responsible for hand-sewing their own clothing, or ready-made garments, typically once or twice a year. Frederick Douglass reported that a field hand received a yearly allowance of “two coarse linen shirts, one pair of linen trousers . . . one jacket, one pair of trousers for winter, made of coarse Negro cloth, one pair of stockings, and one pair of shoes.” Children too young to work received “two coarse linen shirts per year. When these failed them, they went naked” until the next year.

Wearing these inferior fabrics was often tortuous, as firsthand testimonies tell us. Harriet Jacobs was born into slavery in Edenton, North Carolina, in 1813. In her autobiography, Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, published in 1861, she wrote: “I have a vivid recollection of the linsey-woolsey dress given me every winter by Mrs. Flint. How I hated it! It was one of the badges of slavery.” Linsey-woolsey, as the name implies, was a strong but coarse fabric with a linen warp and a woolen or cotton weft. Jacobs well understood the use of coarse, uncomfortable clothing to mark her identity as an enslaved person.

Booker T. Washington included an especially long and harrowing description of wearing an unfinished linen shirt in his own autobiography, Up from Slavery:

The most trying ordeal that I was forced to endure as a slave boy . . . was the wearing of a flax shirt. In the portion of Virginia where I lived it was common to use flax as part of the clothing for the slaves. That part of the flax from which our clothing was made was largely the refuse, which of course was the cheapest and roughest part. I can scarcely imagine any torture, except, perhaps, the pulling of a tooth, that is equal to that caused by putting on a new flax shirt for the first time. It is almost equal to the feeling that one would experience if he had a dozen or more chestnut burrs, or a hundred small pin-points, in contact with his flesh. Even to this day I can recall accurately the tortures that I underwent when putting on one of these garments. The fact that my flesh was soft and tender added to the pain. But I had no choice. I had to wear the flax shirt or none; and had it been left to me to choose, I should have chosen to wear no covering.

In connection with the flax shirt, my brother John, who is several years older than I am, performed one of the most generous acts that I ever heard of one slave relative doing for another. On several occasions when I was being forced to wear a new flax shirt, he generously agreed to put it on in my stead and wear it for several days, till it was “broken in.” Until I had grown to be quite a youth this single garment was all that I wore.

George Washington’s Cook, attributed to Gilbert Stuart, ca. 1795–97. Copyright Museo Thyssen-Mornesmisza, Madrid. His name was Hercules.

This passage is incredibly telling. One would not necessarily assume that an enslaved boy’s “most trying ordeal” would revolve around the comfort of his clothing. Yet, this passage reveals the daily sartorial ignominies that enslaved people were subjected to. The uncomfortable flax shirt from his childhood was a grisly reminder of his former status as an enslaved person.

Self-emancipated enslaved persons certainly had more opportunities to buy and commandeer more extensive wardrobes. On July 3, 1784, an enslaved man named Alexander Lucas—his enslaver called him Ellick—left the estate of William Bernard Sears in Loudoun County, Virginia. An advertisement seeking his recapture described him as twenty-seven years old, five feet ten, and spoke Dutch. Like many runaway ads, the text uses disparaging language: escape, far from being viewed as rightful, is presented as a manifestation of bad character. Alexander is thus presented as “an artful cunning villain, very talkative at times, [who] will make any asservations to gain his ends.” 

The ad also preserves evidence of Alexander’s extensive wardrobe: “The clothes he took away, are such as people of his condition do not generally wear.” He absconded with “a new coarse green cloth coat, spotted with red and white intermixed; a new red striped linen coat, a new jacket nearly the same; with backs of plains, an old coarse linen ditto, a pair of new white cloth breeches, a pair of yellow ditto twilled, an old pair blue cloth ditto, a new white linen shirt, cambrick neck band, two old brown shirts, a pair of black leather stockings, a pair thread ditto, an old fine hat, bound with black, an old coarse ditto, shoes and buckles and an old knapsack.” One third of the ad is devoted to descriptions of fashion. The ad’s emphasis on the number of garments and their quality reveals the importance of sartorial choices to the identity of free and enslaved people. In Alexander’s case, the list of stolen garments can be interpreted as a direct reflection of his aspirations as a freeman.

Today, linen is valued not only for its comfort and breathability, but also for its durability. This is one reason it ended up on the backs of so many enslaved people. Clothing like Alexander’s was the exception; most “negro cloths” were not refined or varied. They were durable and rough textiles that felt more like burlap. The quality and type of fabric used for enslaved people both reflected and reinforced their station on the bottom rung of the societies in which they lived. Enslaved people were daily reminded of their predicament by the very clothes on their bodies.


Jonathan M. Square is a writer and historian specializing in fashion and visual culture of the African Diaspora. His current book project, provisionally titled Sartorial Resistance and the Politics of Redress in the Black Atlantic, frames how dress and adornment served as a form of radical self-determination and resistance among enslaved peoples. He is currently a faculty member in the Committee on Degrees in History and Literature at Harvard University.

Brilliant Move

Brilliant Move is the Brooklyn-based creative studio of Marci Hunt LeBrun specializing in building websites on the Squarespace platform – among many other things.

I love working with small businesses, nonprofits, and other creatives to help them organize their ideas, hone their vision, and make their web presence the best it can be. And I'm committed to keeping the process as simple, transparent, and affordable as possible.

https://brilliantmove.nyc
Previous
Previous

On milkweed

Next
Next

My love of linen